https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274340 The appellant, engaged in manufacturing battery-operated electric cars, sought a refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for fully exported products. The dispute centered on eligibility under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. Relying on established legal precedent, including decisions from the Bombay High Court and Tribunal cases, the Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant. The judgment clarified the appellant's entitlement to the refund, aligning with past court rulings and ensuring consistency in the application of legal principles. en-us Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:24:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274340 The appellant, engaged in manufacturing battery-operated electric cars, sought a refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for fully exported products. The dispute centered on eligibility under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. Relying on established legal precedent, including decisions from the Bombay High Court and Tribunal cases, the Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant. The judgment clarified the appellant's entitlement to the refund, aligning with past court rulings and ensuring consistency in the application of legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274340