<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1575 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to rework the Profit Level Indicator of the final list of comparables, including M/s. Mahindra Consulting Engineers Ltd, M.N. Dastur &amp;amp; Company (P) Ltd, Toyo Engineering India Ltd, Kirloskar Consultants Ltd, and M/s. Stewarts &amp;amp; Lloyds Ltd, and to recalculate the Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustment if required. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1575 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to rework the Profit Level Indicator of the final list of comparables, including M/s. Mahindra Consulting Engineers Ltd, M.N. Dastur &amp;amp; Company (P) Ltd, Toyo Engineering India Ltd, Kirloskar Consultants Ltd, and M/s. Stewarts &amp;amp; Lloyds Ltd, and to recalculate the Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustment if required. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>