<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 448 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to take cenvat credit on the supplementary invoices for coal supply. The Tribunal found no element of fraud or suppression on the appellant&#039;s part and considered the recurring nature of the issue. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(b) of the CCR 2004 and the legal debate on inclusion of charges in the assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 19:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 448 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to take cenvat credit on the supplementary invoices for coal supply. The Tribunal found no element of fraud or suppression on the appellant&#039;s part and considered the recurring nature of the issue. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing the interpretation of Rule 9(1)(b) of the CCR 2004 and the legal debate on inclusion of charges in the assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>