<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 864 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found M/s. Lord Empire International guilty of contravening customs regulations, leading to confiscation of goods. Individuals like Shri Surender Aggarwal, Shri Bhagwan Tulsian, and transporters were implicated in the fraudulent scheme. Show-cause notices were issued with proposed penalties. Key individuals initially absconded but later provided incriminating statements. Financing by Shri Sajjan Kumar Goel was confirmed. Despite retractions, statements were deemed admissible. Co-accused statements were relied upon to establish guilt. The Tribunal ordered pre-deposits for penalties, with a waiver of the balance pending appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 17:26:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 864 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found M/s. Lord Empire International guilty of contravening customs regulations, leading to confiscation of goods. Individuals like Shri Surender Aggarwal, Shri Bhagwan Tulsian, and transporters were implicated in the fraudulent scheme. Show-cause notices were issued with proposed penalties. Key individuals initially absconded but later provided incriminating statements. Financing by Shri Sajjan Kumar Goel was confirmed. Despite retractions, statements were deemed admissible. Co-accused statements were relied upon to establish guilt. The Tribunal ordered pre-deposits for penalties, with a waiver of the balance pending appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>