<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 27 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14002</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the allowance of minimum royalty payable to the Government of Orissa. The Court held that the assessee-company was obligated to pay the minimum royalty as per the agreement terms, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to allow the entire amount of Rs. 1 lakh representing the minimum royalty paid by the assessee was upheld, concluding the dispute in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 27 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14002</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the allowance of minimum royalty payable to the Government of Orissa. The Court held that the assessee-company was obligated to pay the minimum royalty as per the agreement terms, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to allow the entire amount of Rs. 1 lakh representing the minimum royalty paid by the assessee was upheld, concluding the dispute in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>