<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364966</link>
    <description>For an installation permanent establishment under the India-Cyprus treaty, the twelve-month test runs from actual commencement of project operations at site, not from pre-contract tendering or data-collection visits. The assessee&#039;s work was confined to rock transport, delivery, temporary installation facilities, dumping and site restoration, and the record showed project activity began no earlier than 4 January 2008 and ended by 30 September 2008. Completion certificate, demobilisation and receipt of payments supported the conclusion that the activity did not continue beyond twelve months. The Revenue did not discharge the burden of proving a longer duration, so no installation PE was established and the contract receipts were not taxable in India under Article 7.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364966</link>
      <description>For an installation permanent establishment under the India-Cyprus treaty, the twelve-month test runs from actual commencement of project operations at site, not from pre-contract tendering or data-collection visits. The assessee&#039;s work was confined to rock transport, delivery, temporary installation facilities, dumping and site restoration, and the record showed project activity began no earlier than 4 January 2008 and ended by 30 September 2008. Completion certificate, demobilisation and receipt of payments supported the conclusion that the activity did not continue beyond twelve months. The Revenue did not discharge the burden of proving a longer duration, so no installation PE was established and the contract receipts were not taxable in India under Article 7.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>