<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 436 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364964</link>
    <description>The court set aside the orders disqualifying the petitioners under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, ruling that disqualification cannot have retrospective effect. The court found violations of natural justice and directed the Registrar General to reconcile deposits made by the petitioners with the Registrar of Companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 436 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364964</link>
      <description>The court set aside the orders disqualifying the petitioners under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, ruling that disqualification cannot have retrospective effect. The court found violations of natural justice and directed the Registrar General to reconcile deposits made by the petitioners with the Registrar of Companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>