<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 428 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364956</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, maintaining the correct assessable values declared by the appellant but upholding the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty due to non-production of the required license. The tribunal reduced the redemption fine to 15% of the assessable value of the goods and the penalty to 10% of the value of goods, following a previous decision upheld by the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 428 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364956</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, maintaining the correct assessable values declared by the appellant but upholding the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty due to non-production of the required license. The tribunal reduced the redemption fine to 15% of the assessable value of the goods and the penalty to 10% of the value of goods, following a previous decision upheld by the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>