<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision was based on the lack of evidence of intentional evasion and the appellants&#039; efforts to pay the outstanding tax liabilities despite financial constraints. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should be imposed judiciously, taking into account the circumstances and intent of the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 13:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision was based on the lack of evidence of intentional evasion and the appellants&#039; efforts to pay the outstanding tax liabilities despite financial constraints. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should be imposed judiciously, taking into account the circumstances and intent of the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>