https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364948 Penalty on service tax demands for advertising agency services and renting of immovable property was deleted where the disputes reflected taxability uncertainty, the assessee had paid tax with interest on the rental issue, and bona fide belief was accepted; the underlying tax liabilities were left undisturbed. The demand under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was held unsustainable because the activities treated as exempted outputs were not taxable services in the first place, and the demand was also time-barred for want of suppression or misstatement, as the relevant particulars were disclosed in records and returns. Interest and penalties on that demand were also set aside. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:03:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364948 Penalty on service tax demands for advertising agency services and renting of immovable property was deleted where the disputes reflected taxability uncertainty, the assessee had paid tax with interest on the rental issue, and bona fide belief was accepted; the underlying tax liabilities were left undisturbed. The demand under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was held unsustainable because the activities treated as exempted outputs were not taxable services in the first place, and the demand was also time-barred for want of suppression or misstatement, as the relevant particulars were disclosed in records and returns. Interest and penalties on that demand were also set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364948