<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 404 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order requiring payment for exempted products. The decision was based on the principle that reversal of credit nullifies the availed credit, as established in legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized that treating the reversal of credit as if no credit was ever availed aligns with legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:03:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 404 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order requiring payment for exempted products. The decision was based on the principle that reversal of credit nullifies the availed credit, as established in legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized that treating the reversal of credit as if no credit was ever availed aligns with legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>