<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 401 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364929</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was considered applicable to fuel oil and lean gas captively consumed in a refinery for generating electricity used in manufacturing petroleum products. The reasoning was that the benefit cannot be denied merely because the goods are captively consumed where no credit was availed on the inputs in question and the attributable Cenvat credit on input services was reversed under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The view was treated as settled and supported by earlier decisions and a departmental circular, so the exemption remained available and the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 401 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364929</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was considered applicable to fuel oil and lean gas captively consumed in a refinery for generating electricity used in manufacturing petroleum products. The reasoning was that the benefit cannot be denied merely because the goods are captively consumed where no credit was availed on the inputs in question and the attributable Cenvat credit on input services was reversed under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The view was treated as settled and supported by earlier decisions and a departmental circular, so the exemption remained available and the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>