https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364924 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits without requiring any further pre-deposit. The parties were granted the opportunity to present evidence in support of their case. The Tribunal held that the deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be made from the CENVAT Credit account, contrary to the findings of the First Appellate Authority. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:02:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364924 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits without requiring any further pre-deposit. The parties were granted the opportunity to present evidence in support of their case. The Tribunal held that the deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be made from the CENVAT Credit account, contrary to the findings of the First Appellate Authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364924