https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364922 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, in an appeal concerning duty discharge contravention. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal noted the contentious nature of Rule 8(3A) and declared the penalty unjustified. Instead, a general penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27 was imposed due to rule contravention, modifying the original order. The appeal was allowed in part, with the penalty under Rule 25 annulled and a new penalty under Rule 27 of Rs. 5,000 imposed. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:02:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364922 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, in an appeal concerning duty discharge contravention. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal noted the contentious nature of Rule 8(3A) and declared the penalty unjustified. Instead, a general penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27 was imposed due to rule contravention, modifying the original order. The appeal was allowed in part, with the penalty under Rule 25 annulled and a new penalty under Rule 27 of Rs. 5,000 imposed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364922