https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274332 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions of the disputed long term capital gain and commission amount. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence supporting the revenue authorities' claims and the failure to adhere to the principles of natural justice in the assessment process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence in share transactions and allowed the claim of long term capital gain based on the documentary evidence provided by the assessee. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Aug 2018 22:12:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274332 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions of the disputed long term capital gain and commission amount. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence supporting the revenue authorities' claims and the failure to adhere to the principles of natural justice in the assessment process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence in share transactions and allowed the claim of long term capital gain based on the documentary evidence provided by the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274332