<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1620 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274335</link>
    <description>An appeal against a rectification order passed under Order 47 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not maintainable. The proper course is to pursue the remedy before the appropriate forum rather than continue the present appeals. The Rajasthan HC accordingly treated the appeals as not competent against the rectification order and directed the parties to seek the available appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 22:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1620 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274335</link>
      <description>An appeal against a rectification order passed under Order 47 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not maintainable. The proper course is to pursue the remedy before the appropriate forum rather than continue the present appeals. The Rajasthan HC accordingly treated the appeals as not competent against the rectification order and directed the parties to seek the available appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>