<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274311</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the inter-State nature of the transaction, dismissing the revision due to lack of merit. The detailed analysis highlighted legal intricacies surrounding the rejection of the stock transfer claim and the establishment of an inter-State sale transaction based on the movement of goods and prior agreements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 12:06:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274311</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the inter-State nature of the transaction, dismissing the revision due to lack of merit. The detailed analysis highlighted legal intricacies surrounding the rejection of the stock transfer claim and the establishment of an inter-State sale transaction based on the movement of goods and prior agreements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>