<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1044 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274310</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but on the facts the SC declined to interfere and dismissed the special leave petition, expressly leaving the question of law open. The order does not decide the underlying customs issue and contains no substantive ruling on the legal merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:07:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1044 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274310</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but on the facts the SC declined to interfere and dismissed the special leave petition, expressly leaving the question of law open. The order does not decide the underlying customs issue and contains no substantive ruling on the legal merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>