<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 379 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the BOT project expenditure, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of Rs. 78,01,926/- was deleted based on the project being recognized as creating an intangible asset eligible for depreciation. Other disallowances under sections 14A and 36(1)(v) were not challenged further. The judgment was pronounced on 3rd August 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 379 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the BOT project expenditure, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of Rs. 78,01,926/- was deleted based on the project being recognized as creating an intangible asset eligible for depreciation. Other disallowances under sections 14A and 36(1)(v) were not challenged further. The judgment was pronounced on 3rd August 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>