<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 376 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the entire claim of service charges under Section 37(1) for all assessment years, modifying the AO and CIT(A)&#039;s orders. However, it upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement of income for AY 2002-03 by disallowing the loss claimed on the valuation of shares. The appeals for AYs 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06 were allowed, while the appeal for AY 2002-03 was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:37:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 376 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the entire claim of service charges under Section 37(1) for all assessment years, modifying the AO and CIT(A)&#039;s orders. However, it upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement of income for AY 2002-03 by disallowing the loss claimed on the valuation of shares. The appeals for AYs 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06 were allowed, while the appeal for AY 2002-03 was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>