<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 365 - ATFEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364893</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, rejecting the review petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate under FEMA. It found the adjudication order to be illegal as the penalty amount was appropriated from frozen bank accounts and FDRs without proper confiscation. The tribunal emphasized that without confiscation, there was no basis for the Central Government to claim interest accrued on the funds. The unauthorized appropriation of funds not confiscated was deemed blatantly illegal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 365 - ATFEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364893</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, rejecting the review petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate under FEMA. It found the adjudication order to be illegal as the penalty amount was appropriated from frozen bank accounts and FDRs without proper confiscation. The tribunal emphasized that without confiscation, there was no basis for the Central Government to claim interest accrued on the funds. The unauthorized appropriation of funds not confiscated was deemed blatantly illegal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>