<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 363 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364891</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to approach the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) within two weeks against the impugned order. CESTAT was instructed to entertain and decide on the appeal after hearing both parties and address the question of jurisdiction if raised by the petitioner. The petition was disposed of accordingly along with the pending application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 23:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 363 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364891</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to approach the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) within two weeks against the impugned order. CESTAT was instructed to entertain and decide on the appeal after hearing both parties and address the question of jurisdiction if raised by the petitioner. The petition was disposed of accordingly along with the pending application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>