<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 360 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, confirming the demand within the normal period of limitation, setting aside the demand for the extended period, and also setting aside the penalties imposed. One appeal was remanded back to the Original Authority for recalculating the duty liability based on the evidence provided by the appellant. The penalty imposed in the Orders-in-Original was set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 22:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 360 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, confirming the demand within the normal period of limitation, setting aside the demand for the extended period, and also setting aside the penalties imposed. One appeal was remanded back to the Original Authority for recalculating the duty liability based on the evidence provided by the appellant. The penalty imposed in the Orders-in-Original was set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>