https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364887 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD rejected the Revenue's Stay Petitions, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the construction of residential flats under a specific housing scheme is not liable to service tax under "Works Contract Services." The Tribunal found the issue already settled in previous decisions, including the Ganesh Yadav case, and noted that the Revenue's objection lacked specifics and should have been appealed to the Supreme Court, not the High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeals and disposing of the Stay Petitions. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364887 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD rejected the Revenue's Stay Petitions, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the construction of residential flats under a specific housing scheme is not liable to service tax under "Works Contract Services." The Tribunal found the issue already settled in previous decisions, including the Ganesh Yadav case, and noted that the Revenue's objection lacked specifics and should have been appealed to the Supreme Court, not the High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeals and disposing of the Stay Petitions. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364887