<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 355 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364883</link>
    <description>Durable, reusable empty plastic drums used as packing material in a 100% EOU were treated as containers suitable for repeated use, so their clearance attracted duty under the relevant exemption notifications; the duty demand was upheld. On penalty, the demand having arisen within the normal period and no suppression or mala fide intention being shown, the ingredients for penalty under section 11AC were not established, so the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:35:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 355 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364883</link>
      <description>Durable, reusable empty plastic drums used as packing material in a 100% EOU were treated as containers suitable for repeated use, so their clearance attracted duty under the relevant exemption notifications; the duty demand was upheld. On penalty, the demand having arisen within the normal period and no suppression or mala fide intention being shown, the ingredients for penalty under section 11AC were not established, so the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>