https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364882 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the imposition of differential duty, interest, and penalties for manufacturing economizer and super heater coils as job workers for M/s ISGEC. Despite acknowledging the duty payable under Rule 10A(ii) of Valuation Rules, the Tribunal held that demanding duty from the appellants, who had already cleared goods to M/s ISGEC, would result in double taxation, which is impermissible by law. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, determining that the appellants were not liable for the demanded differential duty and penalties due to the already paid duty by M/s ISGEC. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364882 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the imposition of differential duty, interest, and penalties for manufacturing economizer and super heater coils as job workers for M/s ISGEC. Despite acknowledging the duty payable under Rule 10A(ii) of Valuation Rules, the Tribunal held that demanding duty from the appellants, who had already cleared goods to M/s ISGEC, would result in double taxation, which is impermissible by law. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, determining that the appellants were not liable for the demanded differential duty and penalties due to the already paid duty by M/s ISGEC. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364882