https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364880 The Tribunal directed the matter to a Larger Bench to determine the interpretation of Section 3A(2) as a provision for abatement in conjunction with Rule 96ZP. The appellant, availing the lower tax rate under Rule 96ZP(3), was found not entitled to abatement under Section 3A(3) and Rule 96ZP(2), contrary to the Order-in-Appeal's decision. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364880 The Tribunal directed the matter to a Larger Bench to determine the interpretation of Section 3A(2) as a provision for abatement in conjunction with Rule 96ZP. The appellant, availing the lower tax rate under Rule 96ZP(3), was found not entitled to abatement under Section 3A(3) and Rule 96ZP(2), contrary to the Order-in-Appeal's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364880