https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364878 The court held that the submission of Form-F alone does not conclusively prove a stock transfer, emphasizing the dealer's obligation to provide supporting evidence. The court ruled in favor of the Assessing Authority, affirming the transaction as an inter-state sale due to the revisionist's failure to substantiate the stock transfer claim with necessary documentation. The court dismissed the revision, with the fourth issue regarding specific product coverage not pursued by the revisionist. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364878 The court held that the submission of Form-F alone does not conclusively prove a stock transfer, emphasizing the dealer's obligation to provide supporting evidence. The court ruled in favor of the Assessing Authority, affirming the transaction as an inter-state sale due to the revisionist's failure to substantiate the stock transfer claim with necessary documentation. The court dismissed the revision, with the fourth issue regarding specific product coverage not pursued by the revisionist. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364878