<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 349 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364877</link>
    <description>Where a taxpayer has already filed an appeal and a stay petition, procedural fairness requires coercive recovery steps under the assessment order to be kept in abeyance until the appellate authority considers the stay request. The HC directed deferment of coercive action pending such consideration and expected expeditious disposal of the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 23:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 349 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364877</link>
      <description>Where a taxpayer has already filed an appeal and a stay petition, procedural fairness requires coercive recovery steps under the assessment order to be kept in abeyance until the appellate authority considers the stay request. The HC directed deferment of coercive action pending such consideration and expected expeditious disposal of the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>