<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 348 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364876</link>
    <description>The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal upheld the estimate of suppressed turnover for M/s Shanthakoti Enterprises, a granite dealer, at Rs. 28,64,220 for the period from April 2005 to March 2006. The Tribunal relied on Rules 42 and 43 of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge regarding the deduction for wastage. The Court deemed the rules relevant for assessment under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and found the 15% deduction reasonable despite discrepancies in measurements and sales invoices, ultimately upholding the estimate and dismissing the Revision Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 348 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364876</link>
      <description>The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal upheld the estimate of suppressed turnover for M/s Shanthakoti Enterprises, a granite dealer, at Rs. 28,64,220 for the period from April 2005 to March 2006. The Tribunal relied on Rules 42 and 43 of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge regarding the deduction for wastage. The Court deemed the rules relevant for assessment under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and found the 15% deduction reasonable despite discrepancies in measurements and sales invoices, ultimately upholding the estimate and dismissing the Revision Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>