https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274299 The Subordinate Judge decreed in favor of the dar-ijaradars, establishing the correct rent rate of &8377; 38-6-6 due to collusion. The judgment clarified that fraud and collusion can challenge court orders, emphasizing their impact on decisions. It highlighted the fraudulent nature of collusion, vitiating the Section 105 decision. The court differentiated collusion from perjury, stating that fraud can invalidate court decisions, even those under Section 107, Ben. Ten. Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Subordinate Judge's decree and underscoring transparency and integrity in legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Aug 2018 12:54:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274299 The Subordinate Judge decreed in favor of the dar-ijaradars, establishing the correct rent rate of &8377; 38-6-6 due to collusion. The judgment clarified that fraud and collusion can challenge court orders, emphasizing their impact on decisions. It highlighted the fraudulent nature of collusion, vitiating the Section 105 decision. The court differentiated collusion from perjury, stating that fraud can invalidate court decisions, even those under Section 107, Ben. Ten. Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Subordinate Judge's decree and underscoring transparency and integrity in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Mar 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274299