<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 344 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364872</link>
    <description>The ITAT directed the AO to allow the entire claim of Rs. 10.20 Lakhs under Section 37(1) as the expenditure was deemed wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to enhance the assessed income by disallowing the loss claimed on the valuation of shares, affirming that the shares were acquired as an investment and not stock in trade, and thus should not impact business profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 344 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364872</link>
      <description>The ITAT directed the AO to allow the entire claim of Rs. 10.20 Lakhs under Section 37(1) as the expenditure was deemed wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to enhance the assessed income by disallowing the loss claimed on the valuation of shares, affirming that the shares were acquired as an investment and not stock in trade, and thus should not impact business profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>