<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 332 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the services as Cargo Handling Services, set aside the invocation of the extended period of limitation, upheld the demand for service tax within the normal period with interest, and set aside penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 332 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the services as Cargo Handling Services, set aside the invocation of the extended period of limitation, upheld the demand for service tax within the normal period with interest, and set aside penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>