https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364853 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the availment of input service credit for painting and polishing work in a hotel. The Tribunal rejected the tax department's demand for the reversal of the entire cenvat credit, stating that the painting service was not exclusively used for exempted services. It was determined that the proportionate reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) adequately addressed the situation where input services were utilized for both exempted and taxable services. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the decision was issued on July 18, 2018. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Aug 2018 08:00:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364853 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the availment of input service credit for painting and polishing work in a hotel. The Tribunal rejected the tax department's demand for the reversal of the entire cenvat credit, stating that the painting service was not exclusively used for exempted services. It was determined that the proportionate reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) adequately addressed the situation where input services were utilized for both exempted and taxable services. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the decision was issued on July 18, 2018. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364853