<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1585 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274292</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim on business intellectual property rights. The decision was based on the assets being used for trading activities, satisfying the conditions under Section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the CIT (A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2018 20:29:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1585 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274292</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim on business intellectual property rights. The decision was based on the assets being used for trading activities, satisfying the conditions under Section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the CIT (A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>