https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274293 The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte dismissal of the appeal by Ld. CIT(A) due to the doctor-assessee's non-compliance with hearing notices, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000. The Tribunal directed the matter to be reconsidered by the A.O. after the assessee pays the cost. The addition of Rs. 22,40,000 to total income for unexplained credit was to be re-examined by the A.O. considering the subsequent availability of evidence. The disallowance of Rs. 89,646 u/s 14A was not specifically addressed in the judgment due to lack of challenge from the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with notices and consequences of non-compliance in appellate proceedings. en-us Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 Aug 2018 20:29:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274293 The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte dismissal of the appeal by Ld. CIT(A) due to the doctor-assessee's non-compliance with hearing notices, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000. The Tribunal directed the matter to be reconsidered by the A.O. after the assessee pays the cost. The addition of Rs. 22,40,000 to total income for unexplained credit was to be re-examined by the A.O. considering the subsequent availability of evidence. The disallowance of Rs. 89,646 u/s 14A was not specifically addressed in the judgment due to lack of challenge from the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with notices and consequences of non-compliance in appellate proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274293