<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 615 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274284</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and legal interpretations. The Assessing Authority was directed to consider the Court&#039;s interpretation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow proportionate benefit and remand the matter was upheld, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 615 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274284</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and legal interpretations. The Assessing Authority was directed to consider the Court&#039;s interpretation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow proportionate benefit and remand the matter was upheld, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>