<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1079 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274280</link>
    <description>Specific performance under the Specific Relief Act remains a discretionary equitable remedy, assessed through fairness, justice, equity, good conscience, party conduct and litigation motive. Price escalation sought by a contracting party to avoid a sale agreement does not, where the purchaser has deposited the consideration as directed, justify substituting compensation for performance. Foreign decrees of superior courts in reciprocating territories may be executed under the Code of Civil Procedure without applying the territorial-competence test governing original civil suits. In admiralty matters, the vessel&#039;s presence within territorial waters is a decisive jurisdictional fact, permitting execution of maritime decrees where the Admiralty Court has jurisdiction over the vessel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2018 16:14:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1079 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274280</link>
      <description>Specific performance under the Specific Relief Act remains a discretionary equitable remedy, assessed through fairness, justice, equity, good conscience, party conduct and litigation motive. Price escalation sought by a contracting party to avoid a sale agreement does not, where the purchaser has deposited the consideration as directed, justify substituting compensation for performance. Foreign decrees of superior courts in reciprocating territories may be executed under the Code of Civil Procedure without applying the territorial-competence test governing original civil suits. In admiralty matters, the vessel&#039;s presence within territorial waters is a decisive jurisdictional fact, permitting execution of maritime decrees where the Admiralty Court has jurisdiction over the vessel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>