https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274279 Where the original promisee's conduct and pleadings showed acceptance of a later arrangement and waiver of the earlier contractual right, the assignee could not claim a better right than the assignor and could not enforce specific performance of the sale agreement. The Court also noted that discretion under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 required consideration of the fairness of granting equitable relief and the motive behind the suit. On the facts stated, these factors justified refusal of specific performance, and the assignee was held not entitled to enforce the agreement. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Aug 2018 15:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274279 Where the original promisee's conduct and pleadings showed acceptance of a later arrangement and waiver of the earlier contractual right, the assignee could not claim a better right than the assignor and could not enforce specific performance of the sale agreement. The Court also noted that discretion under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 required consideration of the fairness of granting equitable relief and the motive behind the suit. On the facts stated, these factors justified refusal of specific performance, and the assignee was held not entitled to enforce the agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274279