<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1428 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274277</link>
    <description>Limitation for execution of a final partition decree under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 runs from the date the decree becomes enforceable, which in this context is the date of pronouncement, not the later date when stamped paper is supplied and the decree is engrossed. The supply of stamp paper was treated as a party-controlled ministerial formality that does not suspend or postpone limitation. Sections 35 and 2(15) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 govern stamp duty and admissibility, but do not override or extend the statutory execution period fixed by Article 136. The execution petition was therefore time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1428 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274277</link>
      <description>Limitation for execution of a final partition decree under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 runs from the date the decree becomes enforceable, which in this context is the date of pronouncement, not the later date when stamped paper is supplied and the decree is engrossed. The supply of stamp paper was treated as a party-controlled ministerial formality that does not suspend or postpone limitation. Sections 35 and 2(15) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 govern stamp duty and admissibility, but do not override or extend the statutory execution period fixed by Article 136. The execution petition was therefore time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>