<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 45 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13957</link>
    <description>Leaf-carrying basket trailers used exclusively within a tea estate to transport green leaves to the factory were treated as plant and machinery because they had a direct functional nexus with the tea manufacturing process and were not used as general road vehicles. On those undisputed facts, the trailers formed part of the integrated business of tea manufacture and sale, so investment allowance was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:42:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 45 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13957</link>
      <description>Leaf-carrying basket trailers used exclusively within a tea estate to transport green leaves to the factory were treated as plant and machinery because they had a direct functional nexus with the tea manufacturing process and were not used as general road vehicles. On those undisputed facts, the trailers formed part of the integrated business of tea manufacture and sale, so investment allowance was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>