<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 285 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364813</link>
    <description>SC rejected the applicant&#039;s Advance Ruling application under CGST Act 2017. The court found the submitted questions outside Section 97(2) scope, specifically regarding DTA supply procedures and Foreign Trade Policy interpretation. The application was dismissed without examining substantive merits, as the queries did not align with prescribed advance ruling categories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 285 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364813</link>
      <description>SC rejected the applicant&#039;s Advance Ruling application under CGST Act 2017. The court found the submitted questions outside Section 97(2) scope, specifically regarding DTA supply procedures and Foreign Trade Policy interpretation. The application was dismissed without examining substantive merits, as the queries did not align with prescribed advance ruling categories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>