<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 267 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the CIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and allowed the appeal by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was not justified, as the assessment order was not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the A.O. had duly verified and examined the claim of deduction under section 80IB(11C) before allowing it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2018 08:30:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 267 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the CIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and allowed the appeal by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was not justified, as the assessment order was not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the A.O. had duly verified and examined the claim of deduction under section 80IB(11C) before allowing it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>