<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 245 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Service Tax demand for man power supply services but set aside the demand on reimbursable expenses. The appellant&#039;s argument that the payments were for activities other than man power supply was rejected, as evidence showed the supply of temporary labor fell under taxable services for manpower recruitment or supply agencies. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Service Tax demand for man power supply based on the evidence presented and cited a Supreme Court decision to support the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2018 08:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 245 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Service Tax demand for man power supply services but set aside the demand on reimbursable expenses. The appellant&#039;s argument that the payments were for activities other than man power supply was rejected, as evidence showed the supply of temporary labor fell under taxable services for manpower recruitment or supply agencies. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Service Tax demand for man power supply based on the evidence presented and cited a Supreme Court decision to support the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>