https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364764 The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant entitlement to take Cenvat Credit on disputed supplementary invoices from subsidiary companies of Coal India Ltd. The Member (Judicial) noted that the confusion stemmed from similar issues pending before the Apex Court and that failure to ascertain the exclusion clause did not imply suppression or collusion. Given the absence of evidence indicating fraud or suppression and considering a precedent involving South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., the appellant was permitted to avail the Cenvat Credit, leading to the setting aside of the original order and granting consequential relief. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Aug 2018 08:28:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364764 The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant entitlement to take Cenvat Credit on disputed supplementary invoices from subsidiary companies of Coal India Ltd. The Member (Judicial) noted that the confusion stemmed from similar issues pending before the Apex Court and that failure to ascertain the exclusion clause did not imply suppression or collusion. Given the absence of evidence indicating fraud or suppression and considering a precedent involving South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., the appellant was permitted to avail the Cenvat Credit, leading to the setting aside of the original order and granting consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364764