https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364763 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of the major demand but set aside the penalty imposed on the broker/commission agent. The decision was based on the lack of evidence linking the appellant to clandestine activities and emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in excise cases. The judgment serves as a reminder of the necessity for concrete proof to support allegations of wrongdoing in excise matters, ensuring fair adjudication and penalty imposition. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Aug 2018 08:28:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364763 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of the major demand but set aside the penalty imposed on the broker/commission agent. The decision was based on the lack of evidence linking the appellant to clandestine activities and emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in excise cases. The judgment serves as a reminder of the necessity for concrete proof to support allegations of wrongdoing in excise matters, ensuring fair adjudication and penalty imposition. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364763