<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 95 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13945</link>
    <description>Penalty was found unwarranted for alleged failure to get accounts audited and delay in filing the return. The accounts had already been audited before the specified date, and the audit report was not required to be filed with the return at the relevant time. The delay in filing was also explained by the accountant&#039;s sickness, and that explanation was accepted. On these facts, no basis for imposing penalty was made out, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 01:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 95 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13945</link>
      <description>Penalty was found unwarranted for alleged failure to get accounts audited and delay in filing the return. The accounts had already been audited before the specified date, and the audit report was not required to be filed with the return at the relevant time. The delay in filing was also explained by the accountant&#039;s sickness, and that explanation was accepted. On these facts, no basis for imposing penalty was made out, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>