https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364737 The court granted the respondents one month to file a counter affidavit and directed them to reopen the portal within two weeks. If the portal is not reopened, the respondents were instructed to entertain the petitioner's application manually and verify the claimed credits promptly. Additionally, the petitioner was allowed to pay taxes using the regular electronic system maintained for credit consideration. The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely filing of GST Tran-1 and addresses technical failures in the electronic system to safeguard the petitioner's entitlement to credit. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364737 The court granted the respondents one month to file a counter affidavit and directed them to reopen the portal within two weeks. If the portal is not reopened, the respondents were instructed to entertain the petitioner's application manually and verify the claimed credits promptly. Additionally, the petitioner was allowed to pay taxes using the regular electronic system maintained for credit consideration. The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely filing of GST Tran-1 and addresses technical failures in the electronic system to safeguard the petitioner's entitlement to credit. Case-Laws GST Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364737