<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 207 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364735</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment for A.Y. 2010-11 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was not justified as it lacked a live link to the assessment year, relied on stale material, and lacked new tangible evidence. The reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings were quashed, ruling in favor of the petitioner engaged in consultancy business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 207 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364735</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment for A.Y. 2010-11 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was not justified as it lacked a live link to the assessment year, relied on stale material, and lacked new tangible evidence. The reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings were quashed, ruling in favor of the petitioner engaged in consultancy business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>