<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 203 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364731</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, determining that it encompassed both the source of funds and the correct tax treatment. Regarding Section 68, the court clarified that unsatisfactory explanations for unexplained credits could lead to taxation. It distinguished Section 68 from Section 56(2)(viib), emphasizing their distinct applications. The High Court stressed the need to follow statutory remedies and court hierarchy, dismissing an appeal challenging jurisdiction and directing parties to bear costs. The appellant was allowed to address only the quantum issue before the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 203 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364731</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, determining that it encompassed both the source of funds and the correct tax treatment. Regarding Section 68, the court clarified that unsatisfactory explanations for unexplained credits could lead to taxation. It distinguished Section 68 from Section 56(2)(viib), emphasizing their distinct applications. The High Court stressed the need to follow statutory remedies and court hierarchy, dismissing an appeal challenging jurisdiction and directing parties to bear costs. The appellant was allowed to address only the quantum issue before the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>